Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - Anyone tried Nebula?
View Single Post
Old 19th April 2010   #540
Arksun
Lives for gear
 
Arksun's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Cotswolds, UK
Posts: 1,123

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadde View Post
really ?

i´m on an 8 core 64 bit windows xeon server cubase 5, 88,2 khz sampling rate and i can run only two nebula reverbs ... after that the machine gets hiccups ...
strange ...
nebula 3 pro works more economic ? yes ?
than i have to upgrade ...

cadde
Hmmm, I know you're running at 88K which will double the cpu usage of all plugins but, you should definitely be able to run more than a couple of Nebula reverbs with a machine of that spec!.

By Nebula Reverb do you mean the 'Nebula Reverb' version of Nebula, or that you're running reverb programs in Nebula?.

You should definitely upgrade to the Pro version, like I say halved cpu usage on mine.

I dont actually use Nebula for reverb programs at the moment but, I've had about 8 instances of Nebula 3 Pro (Reverb Version) running in a project , using mix of AlexB console programs, couple eq's, panner and fatfunk compressor. My CPU usage on core i7 is at 16% (that includes the soft-synths and other stuff going on). That's in a 48K sample rate project though, not 88K like yours.

Being a Cubase user also, you'll know that Cubase isn't as streamlined as it could be for 4 or more core processors yet. Especially for 8-core owners. The forthcoming 5.5 update is supposed to address that
__________________
Music Producer | Sound Designer
http://www.arksun-sound.com
Arksun is offline   Reply With Quote