Quote:
Originally Posted by slammy80  From my standpoint, and the standpoint of other engineers in the field which I know and have discussed this with, the problem is exactly what you've described: a company (Harrison) has lied about what their product actually is, created a hype about it, and when called on it numerous times has backed itself into a corner of repeating that same "hype" and "spin". |
Just to make sure, I went back and looked at Harrison's web page.
I can find nothing that I would call untrue.
There is one word that we could quibble over regarding it's definition but everything else seems reasonable to me.
I have to wonder what evidence your standpoint is based on?
(I do find this statement a little sad - you actually discuss this with other engineers? And they're interested? In my experience that seems unlikely...)