Gearslutz.com - View Single Post

Dange · 20th March 2010

Ok, I think I see what you've done.

Although, what have you done in the first plot? How come this is different to the third?

In the second plot, you've applied 1/3 octave filtering. Around 100Hz the bands are 80, 100, 125. The software looks in these band and gives an average of their content. You are there essentially decreasing the resolution of the plot. I don't think this is the right thing to do. It does not model how this will be perceived by the ear. All you are doing is making it less accurate.

To me it looks like you have proved that the panel does work in the 3rd plot

20th March 2010	#89
Dange Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2008 Location: London, UK Posts: 857	Ok, I think I see what you've done. Although, what have you done in the first plot? How come this is different to the third? In the second plot, you've applied 1/3 octave filtering. Around 100Hz the bands are 80, 100, 125. The software looks in these band and gives an average of their content. You are there essentially decreasing the resolution of the plot. I don't think this is the right thing to do. It does not model how this will be perceived by the ear. All you are doing is making it less accurate. To me it looks like you have proved that the panel does work in the 3rd plot Last edited by Dange; 20th March 2010 at 07:28 PM.. Reason: to make more sense!