Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - why fiberglass panels absorb lower frequencies than they theoritically should?
View Single Post
Old 17th March 2010   #11
Weasel9992
Lives for gear
 
Weasel9992's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 4,339

Send a message via AIM to Weasel9992
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lupo View Post
IIRC, Cox and D'Antonio claims that heat exchange is the secondary source of absorption with friction losses (viscous boundary layer losses) being the primary source of absorption in such devices.
Like Andre, that confused me a little...they're two sides of the same coin. Thermal dissipation is a function of friction loss isn't it?

Frank
__________________
Frank
Weasel9992 is offline   Reply With Quote