Gearslutz.com - View Single Post

DanDan · 16th March 2010

SAC, try to get at least the topic right.
The OP asked a question regarding his 110Hz, 135 Hz dip.
Absorption on the floor was first mentioned by the OP.
SAC suggested that a 'broadband panel' would solve this problem.
Any sane reading of this thread will find this to be true.
Now that a test/proof is imminent we see the pathetic squirming, the shifting of goalposts, the revisionism. Refections off a mixing board seem to be replacing the floor bounce issue. We also see the return of irrational bouts of text laughter. Standard SAC /the banned foxfyr nonsense.
Once again, I maintain that a normal 'broadband' panel, such as a MiniTrap will have negligible diminishing effect on the path of the alleged reflection in the 135Hz frequency region.
It was and is nonsense to suggest it.

DD

16th March 2010	#65
DanDan Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2003 Location: Cork Ireland Posts: 6,796 1 Review written	Corrections SAC, try to get at least the topic right. The OP asked a question regarding his 110Hz, 135 Hz dip. Absorption on the floor was first mentioned by the OP. SAC suggested that a 'broadband panel' would solve this problem. Any sane reading of this thread will find this to be true. Now that a test/proof is imminent we see the pathetic squirming, the shifting of goalposts, the revisionism. Refections off a mixing board seem to be replacing the floor bounce issue. We also see the return of irrational bouts of text laughter. Standard SAC /the banned foxfyr nonsense. Once again, I maintain that a normal 'broadband' panel, such as a MiniTrap will have negligible diminishing effect on the path of the alleged reflection in the 135Hz frequency region. It was and is nonsense to suggest it. DD Last edited by DanDan; 16th March 2010 at 11:53 PM.. Reason: Mad as a cut snake....