Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - Above the Schroeder Frequency. Diffraction.
View Single Post
Old 1st February 2010   #74
johndykstra
Lives for gear
 
johndykstra's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,576

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAC View Post
First, we address the energy content in reflections, we are not trying to EQ a reflection! A waterfall is simply a frequency plot. It provides NO information about any component reflection of which a given sound field might be comprised. Precisely why we address such issues in the time domain and NOT the frequency domain.
Sorry to beat a dead horse.

I'm not rationalizing the eq'ing of reflections, rather looking at the frequency of the particular reflection to ensure that the treatment is sufficient to handle the content. I realize as well, that these areas of reflection are not necessarily a spot, but a series of spots...a zone if you will.

Given the etc plot shows spikes at points in time... and this particular point in time points us to the directions of where these are coming; could we not superimpose that same point in time on the waterfall, and deduce the frequency content of the reflection(s)? For example, it would tell us how thick the absorption needs to be at this particular reflection, or if a combination of absorption...again how thick, and what depth our diffusor on top of the absorption should be to achieve successfully diffusing the reflection.

If this isn't a clarification of my intent I apologize, but perhaps I need a dumbed down explanation of why I may be wrong.
__________________
phantom power doesn't make your voice sound spooky
johndykstra is online now