Quote:
Originally Posted by DanDan  Really, just once would just fine, where is it? Without the tape measure and calculator please. |
LOL! Do I have to post pictures of it so you make sure you are not looking at the impulse response as you did last time? (fact!)
And YOUR tool auto-converts the time offset to distance?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanDan I really don't know why you are banging on about Impulse Responses and ETC. Any one of us can copy and paste definitions from anywhere. |
Let's see, you demonstrated that you could not even identify the ETC response, let alone evaluate it (fact!); and yet you need yet
another way (the 4th) in addition to 3 ways already described to evaluate a
simple gain/time graph.
And yet you are running around bothering other people as you try to identify reflective incident positions with mirrors that ONLY provides
possible reflection paths
with no necessary correlation to the real paths of reflections which are identified as anomalous.
Do you have ANYTHING to add aside from ridiculous complaints that fail to address real issues?
Go troll another thread and explain to them yet again how to clap your hands.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanDan Insults, Bickering, Taunting, all that good stuff |
Pretty much sums up your contribution to this thread.