Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - Audible difference 44.1kS/s vs 96kS/s? (files included)
View Single Post
Old 7th January 2010   #16
OMNIFEX
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: Great Neck, New York
Posts: 150

Quote:
Originally Posted by Audiop View Post
Aha, that explains it to some degree. However there are some guys that are civil but still have strong opinions so to speak.

Oh well, maybe more members will chime in.


/Peter

Right!

So I listened to the track entitled “SRCc” & “SRC_001” files and, this is what I am hearing through my loudspeakers.

The attack on SRCc is more prominent in which, appears the SPL level could be higher than SRCc_001 at the given peak. The decay is longer as well. In other words, it does not fade abruptly like SRCc_001.

I am leaning more to wards 1.5 kHz however it may be 1.7 kHz where the accent is noticeable comparing both files. I could even be 2 kHz.

If I were evaluating this through my large system I could probably determine where the transient attack lies. However, the loudspeakers I’m using for the Internet comprise of some small bookshelf speakers (8-inch woofers with 2-inch tweeters). The high frequency response is 20,000 kHz so all is not lost.


Was that the type of evaluation you were looking for?

Cheers!
OMNIFEX is offline   Reply With Quote