View Single Post
Old 11th December 2009   #13
Storyville
Lives for gear
 
Storyville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Philly/New York
Posts: 4,789

Quote:
Originally Posted by JROKER View Post
what a bunch of arrogant fux in here... the first guy who responded answered it, and my second question was, about phasing, meaning in the reverb vst itself, it i had to leave the wet at 100% if i send that reverb to an fx channel... i was just told that if the mix level wasnt 100% wet, i would get some kind of phasing... thats all... it was a general question...
I'll assume that wasn't aimed at me, as I simply did not understand what you were saying in your second question. Now that you have rephrased it - your question makes A LOT MORE SENSE.

The answer is: leave the wet at 100% when sending to a reverb channel. You won't get phasing issues, unless you have something on the reverb channel that causes some kind of latency to the output. However, the idea is to have a "reverb signal," exclusively, so that whatever you do manipulates just that. You already have your dry signal on a seperate channel.
__________________
I have a new website - check it out:

www.Weiss-Sound.com

Member of The Pyramid Recording Collective. Grammy Nominations, Platinum & Gold credits, yeah... we got that.
Storyville is online now   Reply With Quote