Quote:
Originally Posted by collo  When it comes to 2D panels, the situation seems to be the opposite. I've not seen any examples of pairings. In fact the only advice comes from RPG, who advise using a random orientation for their 2D panels. In this situation I'm thinking of treating all 2D inverses as stand-alone panels, and am considering using the substitution. |
In this picture from RPG the orientation is far from random :
Most pictures I've seen have the panels all with the same orientation.
A couple more :
Quote:
|
This depth saving is the major advantage to using the substitution. A smaller advantage is that it becomes easy to see the orientation of the panel when multiples are used in an array. A final advantage, and one that is not much use to us DIY'ers, is that the single zero-depth well is the perfect spot to place your manufacturer's logo..
|
I find that the zero depth well looks kind of odd. It sticks out too much.
But it does make it easy to see the orientation of the panel.
Paul P