Quote:
Originally Posted by AudioWonderland  You answered your own question. If the experts say you need ~60, what choice do I have other than 88 or 96 on most equipment?
I have done the test so quit blathering on about it. It sounds better. |
Yes please tell us the details of your test, it is really pointless to just say "It sounds better." You obviously believe it SHOULD sound better due to the "science" you point to, so unless it was a blind test your opinion is irrelevant.
I am interested in this topic as well, a pro engineer just told me that most pros he knows track/mix at 44.1/48 and there's really no point in anything higher. I would think more detail would be better, but I can't say I've ever heard an audible difference. I would like to know because if it makes no audible difference I could really use the extra CPU resources.
Like the OP I'd also like to know what the most highly regarded sample rate converter is.