View Single Post
Old 4th December 2009   #27
DanDan
Lives for gear
 
DanDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cork Ireland
Posts: 5,990

Subjective

Hearing is subjective. The brain has a huge role to play in the process.
Many people have an adverse reaction to small dead rooms, it may be a phobia.
Some of us that actively listen in such small dead spaces, with a result in mind, i.e. the mix translating to the outside world, find the tool extremely effective.
Further more we like and enjoy what we hear in there. Andreas and I are not the only ones who find this. See below reference to survey.
John, I don't think your test would be easy to do or evaluate, but I very much believe in tests, other than simplistic frequency or modal ones.
How about this.
Ethan has a room, treated with lots of diffusion. It has very spectacular graphs and I think we can agree, it is the live thing done very very well. I have a very dead room, horrible graphs, RT or other decays inconsistent or too low to measure, but a survey of 6 recording engineers has scored it very highly. (That was part of the design process)
Ethan has a DPA 4061, maybe can borrow another? I have two.
We could make very similar binaural recordings of playback of one song, Bird on a Wire by Jennifer perhaps?
Then without the bias of lighting, assumptions, ownership, and all the other psycho traps, we can all listen on headphones and 'be there'.
DD
DanDan is offline   Reply With Quote