Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lupo Interesting thread!
Hope you can tolerate a shot from the sideline from another lurker. Just wanted to point out one thing:
To be a valid test, the switching between the sources must be seamless and instantaneous. Even a .1 second gap will be enough to erase your "sonic footprint" memory. The brain is not made to memorize sound. The only way to compare any sounds are by seamless A/B switching. Switching cables takes far too long to give any useable tests.
To claim 'scientific', it needs to be a double blind test. I encourage others to try the same tests and see what they get. For now... I am back to recording music.... 
Sorry to interupt the conversation..
Cheers,
Andreas / Norway |
I totally agree with this. For a test to be valid to the point where the testers impressions can be relied upon as reproducable to others interested... double blind is the only scientific and valid way.
However... I am convinced.
I don't expect that to convince everyone else... and I did of course say "flame away".... but I am still 100% convinced.... and I have done a lot of product evaluations in my time... I am no Lynn Fuston.... but I ain't a Newbie either...
I am sure about my findings.