Gearslutz.com - View Single Post

PinnacleProdUK · 26th November 2009

Thanks for the replies, much appreciated

Yes in an ideal world I would be using 96 all the time (maybe on a HD 3 system through a 64 channel duality) lol

but.....

Unfortunately this is not the case :-(

but with regards to processing

Is there a big difference?

Tracking at 96kHz - Converting then (processing if needed)

Tracking at 96kHz - (processing if needed) then converting

And what are people using to downsample? is there any better way than using your DAW?

thanks again!

26th November 2009	#5
PinnacleProdUK Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Derby, UK Posts: 252 Thread Starter	Thanks for the replies, much appreciated Yes in an ideal world I would be using 96 all the time (maybe on a HD 3 system through a 64 channel duality) lol but..... Unfortunately this is not the case :-( but with regards to processing Is there a big difference? Tracking at 96kHz - Converting then (processing if needed) Tracking at 96kHz - (processing if needed) then converting And what are people using to downsample? is there any better way than using your DAW? thanks again! __________________ "It is ridiculous claiming that video games influence children. For instance, if Pac-man affected kids born in the eighties, we should by now have a bunch of teenagers who run around in darkened rooms and eat pills while listening to monotonous electronic music." If the opposite of a pro is a con, then look beyond this, the opposite of congress must be progress!