Quote:
Originally Posted by psalad  If you can reliably tell the difference between 96khz and 44.1khz in a blind test, then go 96k. Otherwise, go 44.1 and call it a day.
There is plenty of anecdotal evidence about 96k sounding better, but unless it's a blind test it's just pointless. |
The ability of the higher sample rates to handle processing better is not really anticdotal is it?
Its nuts to use less than the best rates available to you. WHether you think its necessary or not today, you don't know what will come in the future.