View Single Post
Old 24th November 2009   #10
tekno808
Gear Head
 
tekno808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Belgium
Posts: 33

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by bass man View Post
The difference is minimal and you will have to spend some time with it to be able to recognize it .
Are you monitoring from the tape deck or from already converted signal ( back from tape ) ? Try monitoring direct from tape deck and then from converters to hear what are your converters doing to the sound.
Sm 468 sounds pretty transparent to my ears , maybe trying different tapes could give you better/different results.
I work with RMG Sm 468 and Per 528 almost every day and and the per 528 is little darker so check it out . I am about to check SM 911 and sm 900 from RMG....
To my ears the benefit of transferring to tape vs only digital is that the files transferred to tape and back to DAW react different to processing ,you can up sample the files ( record 24/48 back from tape at 24/96 or even 192 ), this bump at 50 Hz on my Studer A80 which makes the music sound bigger and maybe some saturation if you want it need it ....
Thx for the info , tomorrow i'm gonna try a few test setups !

P.L.U.R
__________________
Cubase 5.5 ,Scope 5 XTC,2x Scope Project + 2x A16 Ultra+PoCo 6000+ UAD-2 Quad,plugiator Full . Mackie Control+Extender. Otari btr-5 Pro Tape Recorder.
ASUS P5WDH, CPU Q6600@3GHZ, 4GB RAM, 2xPCIe Graphics , 4 Display's . Win7 Ultimate 32bit.
http://www.myspace.com/dominiums
http://soundcloud.com/dominium
tekno808 is offline   Reply With Quote