Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - Why EQ a P-A and not studio monitor?
View Single Post
Old 21st November 2009   #2
TranscendingM
Lives for gear
 
TranscendingM's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 1,058

Send a message via Skype™ to TranscendingM
Quote:
Originally Posted by laperlestudio View Post
Why do I use an EQ on a P-A for live gig and get it sound good with all the compromise of the room, exept a return of the sub form the backwall when the room is empty, and everybody say that the EQ is a bad idea for studio that I shoul treat. I know it's better to treat, I know it really clear the problem because it absorb the frequencies, but suppresive EQing qork good in live I can really start wih a bad sound in the room and after an hour be very happy with the sound... Why it does not translate to the studio?
I'd say for one, the space is different. Usually a PA is used in some sort of larger space for performance. One could say then, it's use is different than critical listening. But also this larger space a PA normally find itself in porportionally increases the listening area, in a way our "critical points" are extended. Low freqencies in particular which are most problematic in typical studio sapces have room to develop in larger spaces.
__________________
- Bob

Audio Services | Nebula Library Dev
....."Digital Body, Analog Spirit"
.
TranscendingM is online now   Reply With Quote