Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyoteous  Which LP mode(s) did you compare? |
I compared it in the maximum latency mode which sounds the best to me. And on the PLParEQ I used the best quality setting #5. I like the Pro-Q. I can't really find a better EQ on the Mac side. I A/Bed it with DDMF EQs, especially the LP10, and I think it sounds better. It certainly beats the Logic LP EQ.
I'll probably buy it because I like the GUI and I need something on the Mac side like this. I can't find anything that beats it so far on the Mac side.
Also, PLParEQ is bringing my 8 core Intel Mac to its knees in 88.2 kHz sessions. I can get 10-15 instances at the high quality setting. The Pro-Q has a similar sound at maximum latency with WAAAAY less CPU hit. And I prefer the Pro-Q sound to Samplitude's built-in EQ, so it will probably find its way into complex mixes on the PC side when I run out of PLParEQ.