View Single Post
Old 17th November 2009   #3
a zombie
Gear addict
 
a zombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 388

Thread Starter
Quote:
Some recommend only HF (thin) treatment at the first reflection points. e.g. Ceiling and Side Walls. For most small rooms I believe thicker treatment, plus an equal gap is best.
What is the reason for only high frequency absorption on reflection points?

I am also making these bass traps for the side walls and part of the ceiling, and mid to high frequency absorbers on the ceiling and walls. I was planning on doing a 1" 703 panel spaced from the walls with 2x2's for my mid to high range absorbers.

So should I use the same 1" 703+2" airspace absorbers for my ceiling reflection points? Or should i go for something beefier that will cover a bigger range of frequencies?

At the moment i have a bunch of 1" panels all over my room and i think it sounds rather "boxy" as there is only HF absorption.
a zombie is offline   Reply With Quote