View Single Post
Old 15th November 2009   #11
audio ergo sum
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,587

Quote:
Originally Posted by dubaifox View Post
...

"Digital consoles are more expensive, more time consuming and difficult to learn/master/teach, and carry with them an inherent potential to crash. That being said, they also allow for a massive amount of inputs, an incredible level of interfacing and control, a cleaner signal, and the ability to program settings for different purposes, save them, and recall them whenever you need them.
Analogue consoles on the other hand, are dirt cheap in comparison, much simpler to learn/master/teach, and will only crash if the power goes out. Due to their inexpensive nature compared to digital consoles, you are also able to purchase top-of-the-line analogs, fully loaded with remarkable features, for the same price as a bottom-of-the-line, entry-level digital console with basic features. The cons remain basic: analogue boards are unable to save their settings to be, and they will always emit some miniscule amount of electronic noise that will be heard through the speakers (though all sound professionals will agree that this amount is typically a non-issue, and more noise tends to be emitted from the other electronic equipment used, like the amplifier for example).
Although a wonderful ideal for user interfacing and audio organizing, digital consoles are simply not cost effective. A well-manufactured professional digital mixer, loaded with the necessary features, is just far too expensive. Due to this fact alone, a digital mixer should often be considered a last resort, and only if there is enough in the budget to pay the massive premium for a top-of-line console. There are exceptions to this rule though, as these mixers are greatly suited for large churches with huge worship teams and productions on Sundays, as well as throughout the week. In those venues, the cost factor becomes insignificant due to the fact that the benefits of a digital console become overwhelming. Those venues have a need for a massive number of inputs, and the ability to interact with them on a much more complex level; this is not the case with the remaining vast majority of churches. In almost every situation, an analogue mixer remains the best choice of consoles for a churches needs. They’re straightforward, cheaper with far greater quality and features versus a digital console of the same price, and are much easier to teach others how to use - which in a church environment is an absolute necessity for the majority of those able to help with sound teams.
One day, when digital consoles are able to offer the same features, and high-quality, for close to the same prices as their analogue counterparts, they will undoubtedly find a valued place in churches; however, that time has not yet come, and for now an analogue mixer remains the most value for the your money, and for their ease of use."
This "consultant" is a bad apple, as Roland already pointed out.

There are many real advantages for analogue consoles also, but he has not even pointed them out. (Since they are usually not within the cheap consoles)

"If all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail."
__________________
"The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."
- Socrates
audio ergo sum is offline   Reply With Quote