Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - Why Is Nearfield Monitoring Not Recommended for Mastering?
View Single Post
Old 8th November 2009   #29
glissando
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: SJCap
Posts: 1,148

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harvey Gerst View Post
The simple answer is that "most" nearfield speakers have compromised performance, due to their design, as compared to "most" mastering speakers. Out of the dozens of nearfields available, there are only about 4 or 5 that would be capable of doing a consistently outstanding job at mastering. A speaker suitable for mastering should not have a "learning curve" attached, IMHO.
EVERY speaker has a learning curve..it's all relative... c'mon
glissando is offline   Reply With Quote