Gearslutz.com - View Single Post

everythinglouder · 3rd November 2009

I compared this to my SPL TwinTube, another tube saturation plugin.

The TwinTube uses slightly less CPU and sounds much, much better in my opinion. It costs $100 more but if I had neither plug-in I'd once again pick the SPL.

3rd November 2009	#21
everythinglouder Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 1,088	I compared this to my SPL TwinTube, another tube saturation plugin. The TwinTube uses slightly less CPU and sounds much, much better in my opinion. It costs $100 more but if I had neither plug-in I'd once again pick the SPL.