Good call xenon, tho Trevor will probably say 'just buy the bloody book'!
which I will do, maybe an early xmas present.
Quote:
Originally Posted by collo  Even with a 5m wall you would want to introduce variation using the Barker code. (I think that as you increase the number of periods, it becomes more important in the fight against the dreaded lobe)
The panel width vs design frequency on the scorecard was making sure that the period width is at least equal to the design wavelength. If you're sticking near the recommended well width, this requirement is generally met once the panel order gets above 7.
Out of interest, I've attached my take on the 4311..(the forum software wont allow the .qrd extension so delete the .txt from the end of the filename) |
The hampster has a message for you, he's upset. (in fact, he's sulkin')
haha, no, what I find interesting is the words you used..'the dreaded lobe'.
Have you ever heard a qrd in action, and if so, have you actually heard the 'dreaded lobe' in action?
gee, as i get older I think I get more cynical or 'wary', but I have learned to take a lot of things with a grain of salt. Especially internet lore (ok, granted this prob came form cox et al) but you know what I mean.
heck, if I followed all the important things in audio I read, then I would not be working on the room but getting the best cables I can!!
For sure, as I say getting old and crabby, but I at least don't want to be responsible for passing on, without personal inspection, unexamined stuff.
So, the question is, how much are we tying ourselves up in knots here? And anyway, it is
really interesting that we can look at the same thing, and come to completely different conclusions!! (tho I do tend to defer to your opinions on technical matters, have much more confidence in them than mine!!)
I tried to have a look at your file, but couldn't delete the .txt..will try again but just a heads up that there are idiots (like me) out in internet land.