Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - Ampex 351, real and simulated and other tape machines
View Single Post
Old 28th September 2009   #88
Mastering
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,099

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave_Amels View Post
Hi Bob,

It is shipping... Very different than the other formulations (harmonically). We didn't set the operating point to 0 like the original tape... It's more like a +6 (456) operating point since 0 wouldn't give you much latitude on the ATS-1. Hope that answers the question.

Best,

/Dave
It would make some sense to have ALL of the tape types "normalized" or "optimized" to 0 VU = 1% THD or so. But I don't think that's what you did with GP9 versus 456, I think you let their normal relationship (456 saturating earlier) remain? However, 111 would run out of steam so much earlier that it would make sense to have a "super 111" inside the Anamod.

I've got to get that card. From what I recall of 111 tapes I've transferred over the years, 111 has a kind of interesting "presence edge" to its sound, at least until it saturates, when it gets pretty nasty. And it would be desirable to "renormalize" it as if 0 VU were 6 dB lower flux level on the 111 so its headroom corresponded more closely to the analog headroom of the Anamod unit. You're not emulating the tape noise so that's not an issue. Is that what you are saying?

How about I pick one up at AES in NYC when I see you guys?

Take care,


Bob
__________________
Bob Katz DIGITAL DOMAIN http://www.digido.com
"There are two kinds of fools. One says-this is old and therefore good. The other says-this is new and therefore better."

No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
bob katz is offline  
Reply With Quote