View Single Post
Old 31st August 2009   #24
steveschizoid
Lives for gear
 
steveschizoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,038

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Zick View Post
I just don't want to see me or my producer invest in the wrong toys.
Then it's obvious; you should use Cubase and take all the money you would otherwise spend on PTHD and spend it on on mics, and/or outboard gear. No one has proven that Protools sounds any better than Cubase. If you want great, non-native plugins, invest in a UAD Quad.

Let's see. Cubase + Lynx Aurora 16 + Lynx aES16e + UAD Quad =
500+ 3000 + 700 + 1500 = $5700

PTHD3 card + digi 192 =
14,000 + 4,000 = $18,000

The UAD plug ins are very good (especially the Fatso emulation!) , so you may want to pick up one of those anyway, which would bring your total to $19,500.
Plus, you have to pay Digidesign for tech support.

These two systems will do basically the same things, but at a cost difference of $13,000! There are several ways you could spend $13,000 that would have a drastic impact on your sound. Ultimately you will be evaluated by your clients and potential clients based on the quality of your work, not by the name of the software you use.
__________________
Andy Sartain

www.mindfieldrecordingstudio.com
andy@mindfieldrecordingstudio.com
Quote:
Originally Posted by u b k View Post
.....Along with a link to one or three of their own mixes that demonstrate what the poster is claiming. Otherwise, they're just blowin' smoke out their @ss and asking me to breathe deep.
steveschizoid is offline   Reply With Quote