Quote:
Originally Posted by zmix  ????  ??? What?
A single sample impulse was the excitation signal for these examples... there is no possible way that 'dry signal is mixed with the processed sound" since they are separated by at least 4ms from the impulse to the 1st reflection and 12ms to the second one...also the signal doesn't modify the taps.. very confused by this assertion. |
First of all - you have mixed the dry signal (dirac impulse) with the output of the reverb and it's therefor difficult to hear the actual level change of some of the taps.
If you delete the "single sample impulses" from the files it's quite easy to hear what happens.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zmix guess it's the use of the term "Modifying" that is unclear. The CD plate has a simple set of 6 delays that are added in parallel to the 'reverb' signal. The "DEPTH" slider controls the level of these taps as illustrated in the image I posted a few posts up... The addition of these taps does not affect the 'reverb' signal per se... How and where is this "modification" taking place? |
I would gategorize a level change as a modification.
The 6 early taps
does affect the overall reverb sound - the behavior of the Depth parameters on the Plate is similar (yet quite simple) to the attack/shape on other algorithms from 224XL, 480L etc. With higher values of Depth you'll get a fast attack and possible an improvement of the early imaging, just like what Sean described (the Attack control of EOS).