Quote:
Originally Posted by TAFKAT  Right,
So tell me StereoPari , is it ?
Why do you consider this OT ?
The information is detailed information in regards to cross platform performance of Cubendo 4 /5 |
As I said, the
bash itself is OT. But there is usually also an on topic portion included, so it's a mixture of the two. There was a reason why I quoted only the end part of your post.
Also, not everything was directly related to your posts. Yours seem to be sincerely more oriented towards discussion than bashing. Yet I decided to quote the post in question, since it was one of the newest containing OT remarks about Fredo.
(another reason being that I'm not yet aware of how to quote multiple posts.)
In the post I referred to "you guys", and while that expression may seem a bit vague, I'm quite sure the writers themselves also know who I'm talking about. Even you know that.
I don't yet have an account on SB forums, nor do I ever plan on registering in your "rebellious" Cubendo site, main reason being that most of your discussions there seem to somehow revolve around the following topics:
- Fredo sux
- Chris sux
- Support sux
- Low-latency multicore sux on Mac
- 500 audio tracks sux
Also the following things might suck:
- OMF, compared to an AVID / PT or FCP system
- Solo / Mute in version 4 (relates to a specific workflow)
- Video truncation in version 4 (relates to specific codecs)
So...you guys always say "you're just helping fellow users". Well, in a way you are. After all, you're providing information. Only all of the information you provide seems to be of purely negative nature, and is always somehow unneededly reactionary against the SB forum or its moderators.
And like lots of other online DAW activists, you have your own youtube channel with a couple of "helpful tutorials". Only these "tutorials" aren't really oriented towards giving any helpful tips or useful tricks you could incorporate into your workflow.
Rather, all of the videos are named as "bug....bug...bug" and focus purely on demonstrating some kind of A PROBLEM.
No Cubase 5 review, no Cubase 5 tips or anything like that you would expect from a "user site"...no, only a video demonstrating one Cubase 5 BUG.
So I guess it's a fine line between a couple of angry ex-Nuendo users who pop up here with some kind of an "argument" or vendetta against SB and a bunch of current users who are just not so interested in seeing the bright side of their current DAW.
You can think of C5 being a release containing an automation bug, or you can think of C5 as being probably the most stable first release ever. Any way you want to look at it.