Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethan Winer  My newer video Hearing is Believing lets you hear the sound of diffusion in a room from a "normal" perspective, as if you were listening in the room. This video also shows the very large improvement in the uniformity of decay times versus frequency when a lot of diffusion is used.
--Ethan |
Yes. That is the video I was referring to. The question was, can we move this forward by referring to in room measurements. If so, which do we need to see.
I don't mind going it alone on this project, and will not have much choice if things stay the way they are. I had thought that the process from go to whoa could have been a valuable resource for anyone to read later.
Maybe magickman was right, no-one can understand my posts or my 'style' turns them off. Sheesh indeed.
I can easily change my style from 'chatty' to 'hard nosed business-like' if that is needed.
Or not bother, ...whatever. The last thing I want to do is waste anyone's time, let alone mine.
I do understand that it can be a one-way street at times, someone get's all the help from others yet gives nothing back. That is why I pointed out that I felt I can give something back in return, a couple of new tricks that may help others in the future. I cannot help with the theory of course, but I may be able to help with the practical doingness.
So, assuming for now that it is worthwhile continuing this thread, is it of any use to provide measurements? Will that give us an idea of how to proceed and the map by which we will travel?
If that is of no use, then do you have any comments about the 'general plan' above, good broadband absorption as much as possible, then diffusors as desired. It may be as simple as that really, if so then thanks and away I go.
Your time is valuable, as is mine. Let me know which way to jump with this.