Quote:
Originally Posted by rogerbrain  that makes sense but... are clocks more accurate at higher sampling rates? OR - do stay the 'same' having the same size errors (in time) which would have a greater impact on a faster rate sample. OR - do they actually generate even larger errors.
OR??
I have moved up from an Maudio 1010 (using at 24/96) to a Motu hd192 (using at 24/192) ...the difference in the ability to mix the low end is VAST.. and the top end is more open.
I do not have means to do a measured A/B test at different sample rates on the Motu..does anyone have any real data out there concerning jitter on this unit?
I was going to get the Black Lion audio mod and the external clock ..after reading this and other threads here I have scrubbed the idea of the clock since I am not actually syncing any other units to this.
eh?? |
the cables are verry important when usign external clock, they all make the same 010101 to sound diferent.
Neve 1073 DPD Clock vs. Lucid GENx192 Clock
also clean & stable power, makes external clocks to be more accurate and have less jitter.
you can do an easy test...
record some analog source... at 44.1Khz,
then record same at x2 , and again at x4.
use the best SRC you can to downsample x2 & x4 to 44.1khz
burn a CD, and listen in every converter you can.