Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - Is LA still a good place to be for music?
View Single Post
Old 7th July 2009   #191
RMJAZZ
Gear addict
 
RMJAZZ's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Leesburg VA and Nashville TN
Posts: 414

Talking Well stated point....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Zick View Post
First, I think there are two sides of this convo...the musician/artist side and the producer/engineer side. I'm on the producer/engineer side.

I've known two very talented musician/artists/composer/engineers who moved AWAY from LA. Why? Cause they could do what they need to make a living with music at a much lower cost of living. Yeah, $170k will get you a NICE house almost anywhere else in the US. Now, an important fact is that they came to LA first, and built up their contacts, relationships and experience before they were able to operate "remotely."

I don't know what it's like to be a studio owner. I have a private one that I use for select projects but I'm a freelance engineer. That means I have to be where the producers are. What I realized AFTER I started this thread is that Joe Bloe and the Buzzcocks can be from Liberal, Kansas, but if they wanna get the attention of Brendan O'Brien they probably need to come to LA.
I like Mike! You make a fantastic point.
Where you are in you career should dictate "where" you should be geographic wise. So LA is still good for getting your foot in the door....the young/first timers still need to realize that it has NEVER been easy to break into the music industry, no mater what city you are in, or what aspect you represent.
__________________
Rob Maletick
www.RobMaletick.com
www.myspace.com/RobMaletick
*Now On iTunes
RMJAZZ is offline   Reply With Quote