Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - 10000rpm vs 32mb cache?
View Single Post
Old 4th July 2009   #2
docbop
Gear maniac
 
docbop's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 182

Quote:
Originally Posted by peeweedrummer View Post
ok i know this has been debated over and over but im still a little confused.

i want to put a second hd in my g5 for the audio files. what will give me higher track counts 10000rpm vs 32mb cache? i already have some external hd's for backing up, so space isn't a big problem.

Western Digital 150GB 10,000rpm Serial ATA-II-300 HDD w. 16MB Cache (WD1500HLFS) Velociraptor | Techbuy Australia

vs

Western Digital 500GB 7200rpm Serial ATA-II-300 HDD w. 32MB Cache (WD5001AALS) | Techbuy Australia


if the 10000rpm drive is better,will it be heaps faster or just a little?

cheers steve.
Cache mainly helps when reading and the drive can predict what you going to access next. For writing streams like in recording cache doesn't help as much. Now a fast spindle speed helps both reads and writes cutting down access times. So if me I would go for the faster spindle it will help everything on that disk.

Now something else to think about faster spindle also mean more heat so make sure you have good cooling in whatever you put a 10K RPM drive in.
__________________
Steve B.
The Dojo of Cool
----------------------------------------
All that we are is the result of
what we have thought. - Buddha
docbop is offline   Reply With Quote