Quote:
Originally Posted by memphisindie  So, you just stated that the only band you heard out of 20-30 that you liked had label support?
You just disproved your own point.
Then you made a supposition to excuse that. |
sorry, i'm not native english speaker, so i maybe written it in a wrong way.
i meant i heard 20-30 albums which i all liked, and only 1 of these albums was made by a band which was a part of the music industry machinery. that's what i meant. the rest was music by artists who either sell their music themselves, or have it release on very small labels, which i don't consider to be part of this (if you don't know why, i can explain)
apologise my poor english, but i don't understand much the rest of what you written / what you tried to say. i'm sorry, my english is not good enough to understand such metaphores...
Quote:
Originally Posted by memphisindie There "used to be" loads of crap fairly recently produced by labels and though quite a bit of what labels do produce now may be safety related drek, only labels and rich folks have the wear with all (musical education, money, friends, prod team, etc) to produce the great stuff.
Is that what you want to happen again, greedy bourgoisie in charge again? Money more important than anything? Including supporting a child molester because they have the dough to make records?
No thanks, people think that fame is like a footprint in the sand on a beach, but, it's more like walking through wet concrete. It has an effect on everyone who sees it but the most effect is on the guy wearing the messed up shoes. |