Quote:
Originally Posted by It'sJoeAgain  ur talkin about phase distortion which btw it is added whether u realize that or not....i was referring to the recording that i am sure it was mono originally then converted to stereo by u...u don't notice the teeny phase shifting issues after the process?? |
It's all mono..
Quote:
Originally Posted by It'sJoeAgain Not tryin to be confrontational but IMO, me thinks you are trying to reconstruct the severely damaged sound recorded on a 19th century format and expect to make it sound like commercial broadcast quality...it's just not gonna happened 'cause the fundamentals for a clean voice in a quite room environment are simply not there and (been told by another engineer) that no spectrum analysis/imaging software will allow you to recreate the missing harmonics only cut or filter them out to preserve what sounds coherent with a certain degree of taste....That would be whoever creates something more pleasing to the ears will win your contest....that's not improving the signal up and above what the technology or the tools can allow but a subjective judgment call.... |
Well that's why I chose this sound, because it's a real challenge to make it sound good. What matters is to see how good it can be made. Probably not leaps and bounds better than what you heard, I know that, but it's all about pushing the limits of the new approach and seeing how it compares with all the more traditional denoising techniques.