Quote:
Originally Posted by rogerbrain  Are these correct statments?
In a given converter:
1)192 'can' give more audio bandwidth (audible or not) |
Correct and nyquist frequency of 96kHz which is way beyond what earthly creatures can ever hear...
Quote:
|
2)If the filters, being an analog componant and fixed, are designed for 96, 192 sample rate would yield no extention of audio range over using the 96 sampel rate.
|
Correct...the converter doesn't extend the source's bandwidth
Quote:
|
3)There will be more noise (or is that better expressed SRN) at 192 than at 96
|
Correct, more *theoretical* noise...
Quote:
|
4)more data will be recorded using the same bit depth at 192 than at 96.
|
Correct again, more memory requirements.......
I beleive u are now an expert in converters...
