View Single Post
Old 2nd July 2009   #51
bob katz
Mastering
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,099

Quote:
Originally Posted by clarkjohnsen View Post
[

One of the most nonsensical statements I read here goes, "Telarc always made sure that their bass drums would produce an outward-going woofer [excursion] for most impact." And just how were they able to assure this?
It's not nonsensical when you supply the obvious missing parts that I thought would be obvious to an observer as perspicacious as you. But I'll supply the missing parts of the paragraph:

1) Telarc ensured correct absolute polarity throughout their signal chain.

2) The statement about the bass drum assumes that the listener's listener's reproduce system has been calibrated for correct absolute polarity. It's a syllogism.

For example, until I discovered that my Lipinskis were incorrect, then signals put on the so-called plus terminal produce the incorrect polarity on the Telarc bass drum.

3) In the analog days, since there was no official standard for magnetic coil polarity there was still a 50-50 chance of being right or wrong, but in digital the polarity of a digital signal is absolutely defined and therefore can be applied at the analog end to the loudspeaker.

4) Obviously the more minimalist the recording, the more that the acoustical wavefronts will align without ambiguity and throwing the thing into a mess.

All this stands to reason but does not reduce the requirement that the loudspeakers themselves must be polarized correctly.

I hope this supplies the obvious missing pieces and that we can move on from this nonsense.

BK
__________________
Bob Katz DIGITAL DOMAIN http://www.digido.com
"There are two kinds of fools. One says-this is old and therefore good. The other says-this is new and therefore better."

No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
bob katz is offline   Reply With Quote