Quote:
Originally Posted by charles maynes  If the system one has does get the task accomplished, that is the principal objective. (I would think) |
Exactly
Quote:
|
some folks require what PT does, some folks dont. It is silly to make it a religious issue though.
|
I'm not making a religious issue out of it at all (no idea whether my previous comments read like that). Thing is, those things that PT IMO excels at have not much to do with DSP processing but more with audio handling and such. Multiple take tracking and sorting things out (or editing those very takes) is what it really shines at. But for all that a DSP solution isn't required at all. Audio processing is a piece of cake for any modern machine.
In a nutshell: I sometimes wish there was a native version of PT available without all those artificial limitations. It might become a true contender for me - as is, it defenitely is a no-go.
- Sascha