Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisso  Whatever the origins, do you deny everything or anything that I've written above.
take a look at BBC online news terms of use for example. |
Quote:
|
You may not copy, reproduce, republish, disassemble, decompile, reverse engineer, download, post, broadcast, transmit, make available to the public, or otherwise use bbc.co.uk content in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any bbc.co.uk content except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other use of bbc.co.uk content requires the prior written permission of the BBC.
|
I have to repost that again.
This ENTIRE argument centers around this...why is the bbc ok with you sharing their information if it's non-commercial but the music industry isn't?
A green day mp3 is more valuable or needs to be protected more than something by the bbc?
You just totally proved my point, chris and i wish i put the thought together earlier.
Please think about this, people. Let it really soak in.
EDIT:
and if your answer to that question is "because that's the way it's always been"...that answer isn't good enough.