Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - The CUBASE 5 thread.. pros and cons. stay on topic!
View Single Post
Old 29th May 2009   #132
Solar
Lives for gear
 
Solar's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Canada/Mexico
Posts: 1,885

Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by StereoPari View Post
If I remember correctly, in SX 3 it was possible to open SX 1 projects. When Cubase 4 came out the backwards compatibility was not so good anymore, but at least they eventually offered a free license of SX 3 for C4 users, purely because of that.

It should be remembered that the first version of Reaper is only about as old as Cubase 4 is - I think Reaper 1 was released less than three years ago. And Cubase 5 IS backwards compatible with C4...

Don't know about the extent of Logic's or Sonar's backwards compatibility, but at least with ProTools I've had some very annoying experiences. Once I had done the full editing for a short film on a not-so-old PT version. Then, when we tried to export it into a (marginally) newer version of PT in a bigger studio, all the automation I had done was just missing...nice...

After that I've never trusted my work to the hands of backwards compatibility, and rely mostly on basic WAVs for transfer purposes.

(Sorry if my english feels a bit weird, I'm not a native speaker)
Why Steiny/Yamama are stubborn? They always sometimes make "stupid backward" decisions that do not make any sense but that's just Steiny. I guess they did stop the backward possibility in their latest update for "money" reasons, to get you update to their latest thats all! I don't see any other reason. If other companies are able to make it possible to backward, i don't see why Steinymama can't!!

Ohhh well!!!!

:(
__________________
MY
Music Producer, Mix Engineer, Entrepreneur
http://soundcloud.com/absolutmy
www.myspace.com/absolutmy
Solar is offline