Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal3  for the record, I have nothing against the basic melodyne technology. it works and I can see it being useful for many reasons you've all already posted. I have used it exactly once (the free one that comes with pro tools), but it helped.
the DNA stuff, however, appears to me to be a waste of time. we've gone this long without it, I don't see why people are making it out to be a "must-have" and complaining that it's not out yet and blah blah blah.
this is just MY OPINION. feel free to disagree.  |
I was in an accident 20 months ago, my spinal cord was damaged and I lost most movement below my shoulders (hands are 'gone')
I never paid sample libraries any attention before this, since I would play what I needed myself, but now they are a pivotal tool when I compose.
DNA will be a very important and creative tool for me especially since I dislike using non edited samples.
The possibility of editing chords is a very welcome change for me. this will open new doors in my way of working and I don't mind waiting a little longer, as long as it 'works' when it's released.
