Quote:
Originally Posted by audio ergo sum  Not true.
Regarding "lack of energy distribution"
What is then the opposite, "presence of energy distribution"?
pretty meaningless mumbo jumbo IMO. |
If you've never heard of the term "energy distribution" is
because I made it up. But seriously, Massive can swear that he has no fear..ehm.. bias against these little analysis tools on a long rant while using his life-changing and enlightening examples {You should write a book of your own: "Mastering with your Ears for Dummies, Mechanics, Cooks and Painters too"
} but yet,
you make a point of being opposed to their use by the mere act of posting on every RTA or tool analysis related thread telling OPs to just use their ears! Pretty hypocritical if you asked me. When an OP asks how these tools should be used, what they should look for or what a certain parameter means, the same group of individuals arrive to oppose using the tool and acting up in concert they all strive to derail the thread. They give absolutely no information regarding the topic and what's worse, the OP ends up more confused than when he started the thread or worst it gets closed all together. Well, I am considering never coming back to this site. I thought it would have real professionals on board. I don't need this constant harassment by the same group of members. Enough is enough.
And FWIW, "gaps" in the stereo field are very different from gaps in the frequency spectrum. Finally, I've always said that one needs to use their ears to do anything with a RTA and that is a "50/50 kind of deal". Never have I ever said that it should be done without a meaningful amount of time spent observing how mix frequencies behave on the frequency spectrum over time.