Quote:
Originally Posted by theblue1  Again, I -- personally -- have no problem with vocal tuning for correction -- as long as it's not obvious. I have and use vocal tuning. I've seen even good old fashioned A-T used with great finesse on vocal jazz to good effect. My problem is with clumsy, inept use of tuning-for-correction that leaves nasty artifacts.* What I was really interested in, starting this thread, is the public's increasing awareness of A-T and whether that will make them even more cynical about pop music. (And if you don't think cynicism and the relationship of the public with pop artists is a real issue, try and get someone under the age of 30 to pay for music.  )
Also, I was wondering if (and maybe secretly hoping that) the added exposure, explanation, and isolation and analysis of the sound of the tool/effect as demonstrated in these radio pieces and other media exposure might accelerate the eventual burn-out of the public on tuning-as-effect. |
Agreed. It's possible to use this tools transparent. Today people throw a sloppy AT on everything and it sounds like shit. Where's the ears?? Would like to send them an Alanis record or something so they get the vibe of a 'vocal performance'.