Gearslutz.com - View Single Post

j2j · 4th October 2008

I think I have a very simple argument here, proving the op incorrect.

Robin from www.rs-met.com wrote:
vieris wrote:

All properly designed Digital plug-in EQ's are the same.

which is a well known fact:

Document Not Found 0.1.1.23.3931

...assuming, we stick to the standard biquad implementation and demand the gain at Nyquist frequency to be 0 dB.

I don't know anything about c++, or coding computer software, but what are you saying Mr. Robin? There is a fundamental algorithm that parametric eq's share? That is what I think you are saying, that is what I think the OP is saying.

Let us chew on this concept--

Are all airplanes, cars, trains, lasers, surgical instruments, buildings, bridges and etc, the same? All of them share some fundamental concepts. Actually, everything on earth seems to share concepts.

I'm sorry, but to build a bridge you follow some very stringent mathematical formulas. Perhaps the same is for parametric eq's. I fail to see how all bridges are the same.

That said, " All eq's are exactly the same, except for X." Is a pretty weak argument. IMHO...

Even if it is slight difference in the distortion and q....

Well, What about the slight differences between a bullet, and a missile?

4th October 2008	#30
j2j Gear interested Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 1	I think I have a very simple argument here, proving the op incorrect. Robin from www.rs-met.com wrote: vieris wrote: All properly designed Digital plug-in EQ's are the same. which is a well known fact: Document Not Found 0.1.1.23.3931 ...assuming, we stick to the standard biquad implementation and demand the gain at Nyquist frequency to be 0 dB. I don't know anything about c++, or coding computer software, but what are you saying Mr. Robin? There is a fundamental algorithm that parametric eq's share? That is what I think you are saying, that is what I think the OP is saying. Let us chew on this concept-- Are all airplanes, cars, trains, lasers, surgical instruments, buildings, bridges and etc, the same? All of them share some fundamental concepts. Actually, everything on earth seems to share concepts. I'm sorry, but to build a bridge you follow some very stringent mathematical formulas. Perhaps the same is for parametric eq's. I fail to see how all bridges are the same. That said, " All eq's are exactly the same, except for X." Is a pretty weak argument. IMHO... Even if it is slight difference in the distortion and q.... Well, What about the slight differences between a bullet, and a missile?