Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - 2track: to hype or not to hype, that is the question

alphajerk · 28th May 2005

really? i would think the opposite to happen? or do you mean you leave it on when you print? if so, i think there is something there since all EQ adds pahse shift, if you add top eq to each track, you are adding more phase shifting throughout the tracks rather than just once on the 2buss.

sometimes, i think it is good to fix individual tracks but when you have a portion of the sonic spectrum that is "together" yet on the whole either high or low in proportion to the rest of the mix, why not just address it at the 2buss?

in this case, it didnt work for me as elements in the mix didnt fare as well as others that i did like about it, so i went back to the individual elements and then didnt have a need on the 2buss.

but so far, i am REALLY liking this GR EQ2NV..... great job dan!

28th May 2005	#27
alphajerk There is only one Joined: Jun 2002 Location: asheville NC Posts: 5,260 Thread Starter	really? i would think the opposite to happen? or do you mean you leave it on when you print? if so, i think there is something there since all EQ adds pahse shift, if you add top eq to each track, you are adding more phase shifting throughout the tracks rather than just once on the 2buss. sometimes, i think it is good to fix individual tracks but when you have a portion of the sonic spectrum that is "together" yet on the whole either high or low in proportion to the rest of the mix, why not just address it at the 2buss? in this case, it didnt work for me as elements in the mix didnt fare as well as others that i did like about it, so i went back to the individual elements and then didnt have a need on the 2buss. but so far, i am REALLY liking this GR EQ2NV..... great job dan! __________________ "i must invent my own systems or else be enslaved by other men's'" william blake __________________________ email: barrett [at] alphajerk [dot] com