View Single Post
Old 24th July 2008, 11:30 PM   #8
bgrotto
Lives for gear
 
bgrotto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Slum-a-ville, Mass
Posts: 2,324
Send a message via AIM to bgrotto
I too have been getting more into setting all faders at unity and building sounds and balances from there. My desk, convertors, and outboard just seem to operate much better that way. The only potential issue I've found is signal-to-noise issues when I'm tracking to tape; I get around that by EQing and compressing on the way in. As for the ability to drive preamps into their money zones, just throw a compressor or fader or other gain stage after the pre. Problem solved. And don't tell me about degrading the signal path with extra amplifier stages. Doing it the way I do it keeps me from pulling the line in amps on my desk way down (which sounds noticeably bad), or pulling the PT faders way down (which sounds noticeably bad), or pulling the desks faders way down (which makes doing automation rides a major pain in the ass). In other words, the added gain stage during tracking is a compromise for improved resolution during mixing, and well worth it.

At the very least, tape or not, I always use 0VU as a reference when tracking. Four outta five times, the faders end up close to unity anyways when I start getting balances together.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by peeder View Post
Vanity (and porn) built the web, and it reached its hideous apex on myspace.com...
In the can/on the horizon:
Aerosmith, Jules Shear, The Dresden Dolls, James Montgomery, Steve Smith, Solace, Jim Jones, Mike Stern, Smif n Wessun, DJ Kurrupt, Dave Weckl, Dixie Witch, Dipset, The Skatalites, Roadsaw, Tony Furtado, Ironweed, Never Got Caught (Clutch and Tree), Elisabeth Whithers, etc, etc, et ceteraaaa...
bgrotto is online now   Reply With Quote