Thread: SSL Costs.
View Single Post
Old 21st July 2008, 06:31 PM   #51
theother
Lives for gear
 
theother's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London & Ibiza
Posts: 1,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by delcosmos View Post
I disagree,

yes it is a Super analogue system (clean), but with tons of headroom (that you don't get just with a Protools alone) also, it is imposible that with 72 analogue compressors and gates, 72 analogue EQ'a, 72 VHD circuits and a quad buss compressor, in the end the Duality sounds like a pro tools system , I have spent year and a half with my Duality, I know what I'm talking about, how many time did you spent on one?


Yes, it has more headroom than PT. But the 4000 series has a lot more colouration/mojo just by bringing up the faders, without any need for the VHD.

I only referred to the summing aspect of the desk and not everything.
The summing is much cleaner, which is good for some people but not everyone.

You need a lot more outboard with the Duality to give it 'a sound' than with a 4000 series. Again, not necessary a bad thing.

You seem to have pretty much everything there is outboard wise, so I'm sure it's working well for you.

I have nothing against the Duality. It just annoys me that people talk so much bullshit when it comes to facts like electricity, maintenance costs and reasons why SSL dropped 4000 support.

Quote:
This guy knows one or two things about clients and the "Wow" factor, why did he choose 2 dualitys instead of a 4000 for his new COMERCIAL facility in NYC?
Time will tell if he did the right thing. In the UK it would be a bad move. None of the 9K studios was/is making any money and all the 4000 rooms are booked full.
People don't like the sounds of 9Ks in the UK and neither do the bands here, which I can understand.
The Duality sounds almost identical to a 9k which of course is very popular in the States, for a reason I can't find. But then, things were always different in the States from here in London.
theother is offline   Reply With Quote