Gearslutz.com - View Single Post - Spatial Imaging
thread: Spatial Imaging
View Single Post
Old 29th June 2008   #13
Adam Dempsey
Mastering Engineer
 
Adam Dempsey's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Melbourne - Australia's music capital.
Posts: 1,720

Verified Member
There could be effective use of varying M-S on only certain stereo elements (eg room mics) in the mix which can remain very natural sounding.

There's also the difference between a good "spacious" mix, and pure "width" - the latter which doesn't tend to come without the expense of reduced "depth". I mentioned this in a previous similar thread, but as far as tweaking the overall finished mix goes...

If, on an otherwise good mix, there's some spectral balancing required in the upper mids/highs (where most spacial cues are naturally) then getting that sorted first via careful attention to EQ can make a mix appear wider, no extra width processing required - especially if stereo ambience also is raised via compression. The KISS principle applies again.
__________________
Adam
Jack the Bear's Deluxe Mastering
facebook | twitter | myspace
Is adding presence the same as subtracting absence?
Adam Dempsey is offline   Reply With Quote