Originally Posted by divine source
absent1,sice you demo the dynaudio BM6a and the focal solo 6 but in the end you got with the twin's,can you compare them here,coz i was on the way to get the BM6a,but since i read here all the good things about the focal's,i want to get one of thus - solo 6 or twin 6.....
and if you can fucus on the BM6a\solo 6,coz i know the twin's is the answer for me,just not shore if my small room is big enough for them.....
I am not the one to give a proper technical breakdown so I am not even going to try.
I went from Mackie to Dynaudio for a few years and they just made everything real HI-FI sounding.
I am sure I will get blasted for saying it like that , but here is my comparison.
When I play a vinyl record thru a Pioneer DJM-3000 with it's limited 3 band eq thru the Mackies or Dynaudio it sounded great, just like it pretty much should.
The same thing thru the Focal's( both the Twins and Solo ) it sounds like total shit
Thus the idea being that my tracks where sounding better and more polished than they really are.
The Focals make you work for it to sound good and the end result is that it translates great!
When I demoed both Focals there was just know way I was keeping the Solo's over the Twins. The Twins have a really nice low end to where I would never see the need for a sub.
I also have a small room( just a spare bedroom) and minimal room treatment. Cheers, Rob