Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilE  from what i understand and from experience i was unaware that there was ANY ADC on LE, however, i have not been able to hear anything less than a few hundred samples (ear check?) or maybe that's because the playback buffer is compensating for it?!? either way, time adjuster is annoying and i hate math!! haha, anyone have a technical answer to this? maybe someone from digi....i hope they are reading this thread. this is market research made easy. if the other DAW's that cost less have it....why can't we?
E |
perhaps the playback buffer is what i'm thinking of.
the large sample delays really do suck,.. i eventually started inserting vintage warmer aross EVERY track just to keep the delays consistent, this obviously had a major tax on my little macbook pro.
furthermore: when routing all my drums to a sub-bus i use an aux track,..and i can't nudge an aux track (obviously) back, so this leads to me usually not using a drum sub-buss.
i REALLY refuse to upgrade to an HD system to get all the things i want from digi, i've been learning REAPER to the best i can so when it finally gets to beta for mac i can replace PT altogether hopefully,..although i will really miss some of my RTAS plugs, digidesign hates it's consumers.
maybe it's for our own good??? maybe they're trying to keep pro tool in the hands of the big studios who have the mula for an HD system, they're trying to keep the middle-man off the radar?
lol
1.) ADC-biggest concern
2.) more tracks-second biggest (hell i'll pay another $200 bucks to get another 30 tracks (on top of my music production toolkit)
3.) better metering- this would just really make me feel better about PT as compares to nuendo, reaper, etc...
4.) 64 float enginer maybe? everyone else has better options (reapear i believe ALLOWS you to choose your mix engine
i think when digi hires you they make you sign a paper saying you'll stay off of gearslutz or you'll get fired.