View Single Post
Old 16th May 2008, 04:41 PM   #9
theblue1
Lives for gear
 
theblue1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 5,327
I think folks have covered the bases, here, but I'll just reiterate what I think are key points:

  • compression can't be gracefully undone once it has affected a signal (either compressing your analog signal or doing a destructive ['permanent'] modification to a file with a software compressor)
  • in the typical non-destructive DAW/plug-in environment, you can refine your use of effects and get it right --
    • it's much easier to get compression right once you're dealing with a signal that's already been tracked. Setting a compressor with, say, a live vocalist can be a pain because they never do everything exactly the same
    • if you're applying compression to something previously recorded you can use a combination of automation and compression to work around dynamic issues -- you can even use plug automation to change your plug settings through the course of the track to help correct bad mic/dynamic technique or mis-matched punch ins
  • compression is a non-linear process that arguably is better suited to analog processing but...
    • cheap compressors are not necessarily really great compressors (although I have a 3630, and, for the money, mine's a tolerable unit; but I haven't used it in several years)
    • cheap/free plugs are not necessarily the greatest soft plugs, either -- but there are some well liked ones -- and some reasonably priced compressor plugs that are very well liked; good software is cheaper than good hardware, for the most part
Hmmm... I think that covers most of my pre-coffee thoughts...
__________________
tkmajor.com | myspace | music: one blue nine | acoustic | latest studio track
theblue1 is online now   Reply With Quote