Dear Ivo:
Good effort, but you've defeated to some extent the very effect you're trying to demonstrate! You started with 16 bit samples and ended with 16 bit samples. Did you dither to get the results? Even with dithering it's going to get a bit smaller. I suggest you take your originals, process them with the processes to a 32 bit float result or a 24 bit result, then zip or rar them to save space on the download. Let's not SHRINK the very things we want to evaluate!
BK
Quote:
Originally Posted by ISedlacek  Here are two short tracks (of different musical genres), presented in the original and then after applying four different stereo enhancers/imagers:
1) K-Stereo (Algorithmix plugin) (790 EUR)
2) Samplitude stereo enhancer (included in the programme)
3) BX control (74 EUR)
4) PSP stereo controller (32 EUR)
Now 20 sec samples (blind - in different order, the respective letter always belongs to the same enhancer) POP: 1orig 1A 1B 1C 1D ELECTRONICA: 2orig 2A 2B 2C 2D
And I would be very much interested to hear your impressions about how you like A,B,C,D enhancers and what each does to the track. Some preference scale (if any :)) would be interesting too. After some feedbacks, I will tell you which is which
K-Stereo was set to wide/deep + 1dB
the others to 118% stereo width enhancing |
__________________
Bob Katz DIGITAL DOMAIN
http://www.digido.com
"There are two kinds of fools. One says-this is old and therefore good. The other says-this is new and therefore better."
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.